Prognostic impact of clinical factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50.

Introduction: The proportion of older patients diagnosed with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been increasing. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy (MONO) and combination therapy of ICI and chemotherapy (COMBO) are standard treatments for patients with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥ 50%. However, evidence from the clinical trials specifically for older patients is limited. Thus, it is unclear which older patients benefit more from COMBO than MONO. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 199 older NSCLC patients of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% who were treated with MONO or COMBO. We analyzed the association between treatment outcomes and baseline patient characteristics in each group, using propensity score matching. Results: Of the 199 patients, 131 received MONO, and 68 received COMBO. The median overall survival (OS; MONO: 25.2 vs. COMBO: 42.2 months, P = 0.116) and median progression-free survival (PFS; 10.9 vs. 11.8 months, P = 0.231) did not significantly differ between MONO and COMBO group. In the MONO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients without smoking history compared to those with smoking history [HR for smoking history against non-smoking history: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.16-0.78), P = 0.010]. In the COMBO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients with PS 1 than those with PS 0 [HR for PS 0 against PS 1: 3.84 (95% CI: 1.44-10.20), P = 0.007] and for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) compared to non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SQ) [HR for SQ against non-SQ: 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.44), P < 0.001]. For patients with ECOG PS 0 (OS: 26.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0031, PFS: 6.5 vs. 21.7 months, P = 0.0436) or non-SQ (OS: 23.8 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0038, PFS: 10.9 vs. 17.3 months, P = 0.0383), PFS and OS were significantly longer in the COMBO group. Conclusions: ECOG PS and histological type should be considered when choosing MONO or COMBO treatment in older patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.

Multicenter, Retrospective Study to Evaluate Necitumumab Plus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer in Japan: The NINJA Study.

Introduction: Necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCN) is a standard therapy for patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSqCC). However, the efficacy and tolerability of GCN in second-line or later treatment for patients previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unknown. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of GCN initiated between November 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022 as second-line to fourth-line treatment in patients with advanced LSqCC who had been pretreated with ICIs. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 93 patients from 35 institutions in Japan were enrolled. The median PFS, median overall survival (OS), and objective response rate were 4.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-5.3), 13.3 months (95% CI: 9.6-16.5), and 27.3% (95% CI: 18.3-37.8), respectively. The median PFS, median OS, and objective response rate for second-line, third-line, and fourth-line treatment groups were 4.8 months, 3.8 months, and 4.3 months (p = 0.24); 15.7 months, 11.6 months, and 10.1 months (p = 0.06); and 31.0%, 13.6%, and 37.5% (p = 0.22), respectively. The severity of GCN-related skin disorders was associated with longer PFS (p < 0.05) and OS (p < 0.05). The frequencies of grade ≥3 skin disorders, hypomagnesemia, pneumonitis, and febrile neutropenia were 16.1%, 7.5%, 1.1%, and 4.3%, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: GCN for ICI-pretreated patients with LSqCC seems tolerable and offers promising efficacy regardless of treatment line, and ICI pretreatment might enhance GCN efficacy.

Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and High PD-L1 Expression: Focus on the Role of Performance Status.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy are approved first-line treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing high levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, appropriate treatment for patients showing high PD-L1 expression and poor performance status (PS) is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify a treatment option that is better for these patients in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 425 patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression were included retrospectively. All patients received either pembrolizumab monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Patients were subdivided into good (PS score 0 or 1; n = 354) and poor PS groups (PS score 2 or 3; n = 71). Early progressive disease (PD) was defined as PD within 3 months of ICI-based therapy initiation. RESULTS: The good PS group had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the poor PS group upon ICI-based therapy administration. In the poor PS group, no significant difference was observed in PFS and OS between pembrolizumab monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy. In the good PS group, pembrolizumab monotherapy, PD-L1 50-89%, and liver metastasis were associated with early PD, as determined using multivariate logistic regression analyses. However, in the poor PS group, the multivariate logistic regression analyses did not show an association between pembrolizumab monotherapy and early PD. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSCLC exhibiting poor PS and high PD-L1 expression, ICI plus chemotherapy did not confer PFS or OS benefit compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Concomitant Proton Pump Inhibitor Use With Pembrolizumab Monotherapy vs Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy with pembrolizumab and ICI plus chemotherapy have been approved as first-line treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for patients with a programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 50% or more, but the choice between these 2 therapeutic options is unclear. Objective: To clarify the association of a history of concurrent medication use with treatment outcomes for ICIs with or without chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC with a high PD-L1 TPS and to determine whether these clinical histories are biomarkers for appropriate treatment selection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study at 13 hospitals in Japan included patients with advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of 50% or more who had received pembrolizumab ICI monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy as the initial treatment between March 2017 and December 2020. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 18.5 (9.2-31.2) months. Data were analyzed from April 2022 through May 2023. Exposure: ICI monotherapy with pembrolizumab or ICI plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary analysis was the association of treatment outcomes with baseline patient characteristics, including concomitant drug history, after propensity score matching. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the associations of patient characteristics with survival outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association of concomitant medication history with treatment outcomes and other patient characteristics. Results: A total of 425 patients with NSCLC were enrolled in the study including 271 patients (median [range] age, 72 [43-90] years; 215 [79%] men) who were treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line treatment and 154 patients (median [range] age, 69 [36-86] years; 121 [79%] men) who were treated with ICI plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. In multivariable analysis, a history of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use was independently associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in the pembrolizumab monotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.00-1.91; P = .048), but not in the ICI plus chemotherapy group. In patients with a PPI history, both the median (IQR) PFS (19.3 [9.0 to not reached] months vs 5.7 [2.4 to 15.2] months; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.72; P = .002) and the median (IQR) overall survival (not reached [9.0 months to not reached) vs 18.4 [10.5 to 50.0] months; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.92; P = .03) were significantly longer in the ICI plus chemotherapy group than in the pembrolizumab monotherapy group. In patients without a history of PPI use, both the median (IQR) PFS (18.8 months [6.6 months to not reached] vs 10.6 months [2.7 months to not reached]; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.17; P = .26) and the median (IQR) overall survival (not reached [12.6 months to not reached] vs 29.9 [13.3 to 54.3] months, HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.48-1.18; P = .21) did not differ between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that a history of PPI use could be an important clinical factor in treatment decision-making for patients with NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of 50% or more.

Ramucirumab Plus Docetaxel for Patients with Non-small cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases: A Multicenter, Open-Label Single-Arm Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab plus docetaxel combination therapy (DOC/RAM) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) achieves favorable outcomes; however, efficacy and safety for patients with brain metastases are still unclear. METHODS: Eligible patients included those with advanced NSCLC with measurable asymptomatic brain metastases that progressed after chemotherapy. Patients were intravenously administered ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) and docetaxel (60 mg/m2) every 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Due to difficulties in accumulating the planned 65 participants, enrollment was terminated early when 25 patients were enrolled. Primary endpoint: Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% CI, 1.8-5.3). Secondary endpoints: Median intracranial progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5-5.9); median overall survival was 20.9 months (95% CI, 6.6-not possible to estimate); objective response rate was 20% (95% CI, 6.8-40.7); disease control rate was 68% (95% CI, 46.5-85.1). The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia in 10 patients (40%). Neither intracranial hemorrhage nor grade 5 adverse events were observed. Patients with higher serum soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 concentrations at the start of treatment had slightly longer PFS. CONCLUSION: No clinical concerns were identified with DOC/RAM for NSCLC with brain metastases in this study. Further investigation with a larger sample size is needed to determine the tolerability and safety of these populations (Trial Identifiers: University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan [UMIN000024551] and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials [jRCTs071180048]).

Real-world Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab, Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for First-line Treatment of Japanese Patients With Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Platinum-doublet chemotherapy plus either programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors has been reported to improve the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The IMpower150 study showed significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival with atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab, a humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (ABCP therapy) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with non-squamous NSCLC. We herein report the efficacy and safety of ABCP therapy in Japanese patients with non-squamous NSCLC in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABCP therapy in 30 patients treated at our hospital from February 2019 to December 2021. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 69 years, 24 (80.0%) patients were male, 29 (96.7%) patients had a performance status of 0 or 1, 28 (93.3%) patients had adenocarcinoma histology, and 7 (23.3%) patients had epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Evaluation of the PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) showed that 12 (40.0%), 8 (26.7%), and 6 (20.0%) patients had a TPS of ≥50%, 1% to 49%, and <1%, respectively. The objective response rate of the intention-to-treat wild-type population was 73.9%, and the median progression-free survival was 8.3 months. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced pneumonitis occurred in one (3.3%) patient. CONCLUSION: ABCP therapy for Japanese non-squamous NSCLC patients in a clinical setting achieved a high response rate with low incidence of ICI-induced pneumonitis equivalent to those observed in IMpower150 study.

A Phase II Trial on Osimertinib as a First-Line Treatment for EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced NSCLC in Elderly Patients: The SPIRAL-0 Study.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is one of the standard first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, because it achieves significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than conventional first-line treatments (hazard ratio: 0.46). However, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for patients aged ≥75 years remain unclear. METHODS: This phase II study was performed to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for elderly patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoint was 1-year PFS rate; secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The 1-year PFS rate was 59.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.1%-72.7%), which did not meet the primary endpoint (the threshold 1-year PFS rate of 50% predicted using data from the NEJ003 study). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were rash/dermatitis acneiform/ALT increased/hypokalemia (2 patients, 5%). Seven patients developed pneumonitis (17.5%). There were no other cases of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events other than pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: Although this study did not meet the primary endpoint, osimertinib was tolerable for elderly patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials [JRCT] ID number: jRCTs071180007).

Prognostic Nutritional Index and Lung Immune Prognostic Index as Prognostic Predictors for Combination Therapies of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cytotoxic Anticancer Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapies (chemoimmunotherapy) is associated with significantly better survival outcomes than cytotoxic chemotherapies alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are no prognostic markers for chemoimmunotherapy. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) are prognostic biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapies. Thus, we aimed to examine whether these factors could also be prognostic markers for chemoimmunotherapy. We retrospectively examined 237 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy. In the total group, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months. Multivariate analysis of OS and PFS revealed significant differences based on PNI and LIPI. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was also significantly associated with OS and PFS. PNI and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of <50% and poor LIPI (regardless of PD-L1 TPS) were associated with poor prognosis. PNI and LIPI predicted survival outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy, especially in patients with PD-L1 TPS <50%. For patients in this poor category, chemoimmunotherapy may result in a worse prognosis than expected.

Impact of Results of TTF-1 Immunostaining on Efficacy of Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients with Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed is a key drug in chemotherapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nonsq NSCLC). Several studies have reported thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) as a biomarker of the efficacy in chemotherapy regimens, including pemetrexed in non-Asian people. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the impact of the results of the TTF-1 immunostaining of tumor cells on the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy in Japanese patients with nonsq NSCLC. METHODS: We examined the results of TTF-1 immunostaining and the clinical background of Japanese patients with nonsq NSCLC who received platinum-doublet chemotherapy at our hospital, from April 2009 to April 2021, and the correlation between regimens with or without pemetrexed in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The efficacy of each regimen was then compared between TTF-1-positive and TTF-1-negative tumors. RESULTS: TTF-1 immunostaining was performed in 145 patients during the study period: 92 were positive, and 53 were negative. A total of 24 patients presented with EGFR/ALK gene abnormality (16.6%). The PFS and OS of patients who were TTF-1-positive tended to be longer than those of the patients who were TTF-1-negative under either regimen. In other words, patients who were TTF-1-negative were frequently resistant to numerous chemotherapy drugs and experienced a poor prognosis under both regimens. The OS of patients who were TTF-1-positive and treated with the pemetrexed regimen was significantly longer than those on regimens without pemetrexed (963 vs. 412 days, HR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.55-0.96, p = 0.022), whereas there was no difference in PFS. CONCLUSIONS: The positivity of TTF-1 immunostaining in tumors could be a predominant prognostic marker for patients who have advanced nonsq NSCLC. Our analysis examined the possibility of a pemetrexed regimen leading to a longer prognosis in Asian patients who were TTF-1-positive for nonsq NSCLC, as shown in previous studies.

Impact of maintenance therapy following induction immunochemotherapy for untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to identify the potential predictors to assess the impact of maintenance therapy after induction immunochemotherapy in the real-world setting of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 152 patients with advanced NSCLC who received immunochemotherapy at 8 hospitals in Japan between January 2019 and December 2019. Patients who received at least four cycles of induction immunochemotherapy and one cycle of maintenance therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors were included. We investigated the biomarkers for progression-free survival (PFS) for maintenance therapy after induction immunochemotherapy. RESULTS: Out of the 92 patients with advanced NSCLC included in the study, 42 received maintenance therapy with cytotoxic agents, whereas 50 received maintenance therapy without cytotoxic agents. Among those who received maintenance therapy without cytotoxic agents, responders to prior immunochemotherapy had significantly longer PFS than non-responders (p = 0.004), except those with maintenance therapy with cytotoxic agents. In non-responders to prior immunochemotherapy, patients with maintenance therapy with cytotoxic agents had significantly longer PFS than those with maintenance therapy without cytotoxic agents (log-rank p = 0.007), whereas, among responders to prior immunochemotherapy, there was no significant difference in PFS for different maintenance regimens (log-rank p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study showed that response to prior immunochemotherapy was associated with clinical outcomes among patients with advanced NSCLC who received maintenance therapy.

Early discontinuation of induction therapy in chemoimmunotherapy as an effective alternative to the standard regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate whether induction chemotherapy with less than four courses is as effective as induction chemotherapy with more than four courses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 249 patients with NSCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy at 12 centers in Japan between January and December 2019. The patient group that completed less than four courses owing to adverse events (AEs), and received subsequent maintenance therapy was compared to the group that received at least four courses of induction chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy. RESULTS: On univariate and multivariate analyses, the patient group that transitioned to maintenance therapy after completing less than four courses of induction chemotherapy had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those who completed at least four courses (hazard ratio [HR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-3.37, p < 0.001 and HR 2.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.40-3.84, p = 0.001, respectively). There was no obvious difference in PFS between the group in which induction chemotherapy ended in two or three courses leading to partial or complete response, and the group that continued at least four courses of induction chemotherapy (log-rank test p = 0.53). CONCLUSION: Treatment efficacy may be maintained if induction chemotherapy is completed in less than four courses owing to development of AEs, and is administered for more than two courses with partial or complete response; efficacy is maintained even on transitioning to maintenance therapy.

Discovery of 3-amino-4-{(3S)-3-[(2-ethoxyethoxy)methyl]piperidin-1-yl}thieno[2,3-b]pyridine-2-carboxamide (DS96432529): A potent and orally active bone anabolic agent.

The continuing investigation of SAR of 3-aminothieno[2,3-b]pyridine-2-carboxamide derivatives has been described. In this study, C4-piperidine derivatives with polar functional groups were synthesized to develop orally available bone anabolic agents. The optimized compound 9o (DS96432529), which exhibited the best PK profile and high in vitro activity, showed the highest in vivo efficacy in this series. Moreover, significant synergistic effects were observed following co-administration of DS96432529 and alendronate or parathyroid hormone. The mechanism of action is most likely mediated through CDK8 inhibition.

Clinical impact of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy is considered to be one of the standard treatment options for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical significance of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC has not yet been fully understood. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate how aging affects the therapeutic impact of chemotherapy combine with immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 203 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with the combination therapy of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy between January 2019 and December 2019 at 12 institutions in Japan. We analyzed the clinical impacts of age on the following two groups: those who received pembrolizumab with platinum and pemetrexed (pemetrexed regimen) and those who received pembrolizumab with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel/paclitaxel (paclitaxel regimen). Progression-free and overall survival were assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis demonstrated that progression-free and overall survival were significantly shorter in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with NSCLC than in non-elderly patients (aged <75 years) with NSCLC in the pemetrexed regimen group. In contrast, there were no significant differences in progression-free and overall survival between elderly patients and non-elderly patients with NSCLC in the paclitaxel regimen group. In elderly patients with NSCLC, a programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score of ≥50% was significantly associated with progression-free survival, and performance status of ≥2 was significantly associated with overall survival. Low albumin level (<3.5 g/dL) was significantly associated with both progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: The results of this retrospective study show that the pemetrexed regimen, but not the paclitaxel regimen, was related to poor clinical outcomes in elderly patients with NSCLC.

Impact of cancer cachexia on the therapeutic outcome of combined chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

Although previous studies suggest that cancer cachexia is a poor prognostic factor for immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, the impact of cancer cachexia on chemoimmunotherapy is unclear. We investigated the impact of cancer cachexia on the therapeutic outcomes of chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively analyzed patients' medical records with NSCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy in 12 institutions in Japan between January and November 2019. We defined cancer cachexia as weight loss exceeding 5% of the total body weight or a body mass index of < 20 kg/m2 and weight loss of more than 2% of the total body weight within 6 months before chemoimmunotherapy initiation, with laboratory results exceeding reference values. This study enrolled 235 patients with NSCLC, among whom 196 were eligible for analysis, and 50 (25.5%) met the criteria for cachexia diagnosis. Patients with cancer cachexia had a significantly higher frequency of a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ≥ 50% (48%, p = .01) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS; log-rank test: p = .04) than patients without cachexia. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the cachexia and no-cachexia groups (log-rank test: p = .14). In the PD-L1 ≥ 50% population, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS (log-rank test: p = .19 and p = .79, respectively) between patients with NSCLC in the cachexia or no-cachexia groups. Cancer cachexia might be a poor prognostic factor in patients with NSCLC receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

Lung squamous cell carcinoma with severe hypomagnesemia due to cisplatin plus gemcitabine in combination with necitumumab therapy: A case report.

A 72-year-old man, diagnosed with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma, was administered of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with necitumumab, a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as a sixth-line treatment. Tumor shrinkage was observed, but asymptomatic grade 4 hypomagnesemia occurred on day 8 of the second cycle. He received magnesium replenishment and hypomagnesemia recovered on day 40, but tumor progression was observed during the period of magnesium correction. Hypomagnesemia is known as a major adverse event of treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies, but there have been no case reports of severe hypomagnesemia or its clinical course.

Feasibility, utility, and safety of transbronchial cryobiopsy for interstitial lung diseases in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is a new technique that enables larger tissue collection than can be obtained by conventional transbronchial lung biopsy. TBLC is becoming popular worldwide and is performed for diffuse lung disease and lung cancer. However, only a few reports of TBLC have been published in Japan. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TBLC at our hospital and compare these findings with past reports. METHODS: From April 2018 to January 2020, 38 patients who underwent TBLC for diffuse lung disease at our hospital were evaluated with respect to age, sex, biopsy site, biopsy size, diagnostic disease, and complications. RESULTS: The patients who underwent TBLC were 20 men and 18 women with an average age of 63.7 years. The average sample size was 5.7 mm, and the diagnostic rate was 65.7% (25/38). Grade ≥2 complications included bleeding (15.8%), pneumothorax (2.6%), and atrial fibrillation (2.6%). CONCLUSIONS: TBLC was considered to be useful for the diagnosis of diffuse lung disease and could be safely performed.

Final Results from a Phase II Trial of Osimertinib for Elderly Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor t790m-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Progressed during Previous Treatment.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are used for treating EGFR-mutated lung cancer, and osimertinib is effective in cases that acquired T790M mutations after treatment with the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. However, no study has evaluated its safety and efficacy in older patients. This phase II trial (jRCTs071180002) evaluated osimertinib in T790M mutation-positive Japanese patients who were ≥75 years old and had experienced relapse or progression after previous EGFR-TKI treatment. Our previous report that enrolled 36 patients showed the overall response rate (58.3%) and disease control rate (97.2%), while this report describes the results for the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety analyses. The median PFS was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.9-17.5), and the median OS was 22.0 months (95% CI: 16.0 months-not reached). The most frequent adverse events were anemia/hypoalbuminemia (27 patients, 75.0%), thrombocytopenia (21 patients, 58.3%), and paronychia/anorexia/diarrhea/neutropenia (15 patients, 41.7%). Pneumonitis was observed in four patients (11.1%), including two patients (5.6%) with Grade 3-4 pneumonitis. These results suggest that osimertinib was relatively safe and effective for non-small cell lung cancer that acquired T790M mutations after previous EGFR-TKI treatment, even among patients who were ≥75 years old.

Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of 4-alkoxy-thieno[2,3-b]pyridine derivatives as potent alkaline phosphatase enhancers for osteoporosis treatment.

The synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a novel series of 3-aminothieno[2,3-b]pyridine-2-carboxamides were explored. Our efforts were focused on modifying the C-4 substituent of the thienopyridine ring to develop orally available bone anabolic agents. 4-Alkoxy derivatives were found to be novel ALPase enhancers without inhibitory effect on P450 activity. Among these derivatives, compound 6k was orally administered to ovariectomized rats, and it was found to significantly improve areal bone mineral density at a dose of 30 mg/kg/day.

Osimertinib in Elderly Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor T790M-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Progressed During Prior Treatment: A Phase II Trial.

LESSONS LEARNED: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 85% of lung cancer in elderly patients.In the present study performed in the 36 elderly subjects with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive NSCLC, osimertinib 80 mg demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the objective response rate, which was comparable to those in the nonelderly population.Osimertinib appears to be an effective and safe treatment option in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation; further research in larger scale is warranted. BACKGROUND: Previous findings suggest the possibility of relatively safe use of osimertinib for patients with T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with few serious adverse events for the elderly in comparison with conventional endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and with an antitumor effect. METHODS: This phase II study was performed to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for elderly patients aged ≥75 years with ineffective prior EGFR TKI treatment or with recurrence in T790M EGFR TKI resistance mutation-positive NSCLC. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included in the analyses. Among the 36 subjects, 63.9% were female, with mean age of 79.9 years. The objective response rate (ORR) was 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.2%-72.9%), demonstrating statistically significant efficacy of osimertinib (p = .0017). The median duration of response (DOR) was 27.9 weeks (95% CI, 21.1-82.0). Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were 2.8% and 55.6%, respectively. Disease control rate (DCR) was 97.2%. A waterfall plot revealed that 33 (91.6%) subjects exhibited tumor shrinkage during treatment, including 12 of 14 subjects who had stable disease (SD). All adverse events were not reason for discontinuation of the study drug. CONCLUSION: Osimertinib may be an effective and safe treatment option in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation.

Treatment rationale and design of the SPIRAL study: A phase II trial of osimertinib in elderly epidermal growth factor receptor T790M-positive nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients who progressed during prior EGFR-TKI treatment.

BACKGROUND: Advances in epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment led to research on the mechanism of the resistance have revealed that an occurrence of T790M gene mutation generated in exon 20 of the EGFR gene is associated with approximately 50% to 60% of observed resistance. Osimertinib, a 3rd-generation EGFR-TKI, has been shown to be effective against both EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. In this study, we prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in elderly patients aged ≥75 years, with ineffective prior EGFR-TKI treatment or with recurrence of EGFR-TKI mutation-positive or T790M mutation-positive nonsmall-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 35 subjects of both sexes aged ≥75 years with T790M mutation will be included. Participants with pulmonary disorders such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, interstitial pneumonia, pneumoconiosis, active radiation pneumonitis, drug-induced pneumonia, and symptomatic brain metastasis will be excluded. Eligible patients will be administrated osimertinib (80 mg/d) until disease progression. The primary outcome is antitumor effect (objective response rate). The secondary outcomes are progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control rate, and safety. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine and all the participating hospitals. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before registration, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results of the study will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number = UMIN000022553.